A Cartoon of Mahler

 

 

Symphony No. 1

Copyist's orchestral parts – [CO1/CO2]

 

Present location, if they survive, unknown

 

 

 

Date
  [?1888–9; rev. or CO2 produced, inter February–September 1893]

Notes

 

Mahler was anxious to arrange a performance almost as soon as the ink was dry on his fair copy of the Symphony, and approaches to Dresden, Leipzig, Munich and Prague seem to have been made over the summer months (see the chronology for an overview of events). Following the success of his completion of Die drei Pintos, Mahler was in a more secure financial position than heretofore (he could offer Strauss 1000 marks towards the cost of copying the performing material for Guntram - see GMRSB,  30; GMRSBE, 31), so could have ordered the parts quite promptly. However it is perhaps significant that according to a letter to Paul Bernhard Limburger, one of the directors of the Leipzig Gewandhaus, with whom he had correspondence in the hope of securing a performance of the work there (HLG1, 184 and 868, fn. 75), Mahler didn't intended to have a copy of the score prepared until September 1888: normally any parts would have been prepared after the completion of this copy. But as the various opportunities slipped by, Mahler may have postponed the task of producing the set until a firm date emerged, which it did when in early September 1889 he was approached by a delegation from the Budapest Philharmonic with a request for permission to perform one of his symphonic works (ZRGMH, 75).

After the controversial première on 20 November 1889 the Symphony remained in Mahler's desk for a few years (though he did try to interest at least one publisher and a conductor in the work in 1891 (see chronology)), until late 1892 or early 1893, when he undertook a thorough revision of the work, and wrote out a new fair copy (AF2) and ordered a new manuscript copy of the score (ACF2). The new version was first heard in Hamburg on 23 October 1893; what is not known is whether the original part set ([CO1]) had merely been revised, or whether an entirely new one ([CO2]) was produced. The extent of the revisions made in 1893, and the fact that Mahler rethought the placing of rehearsal numbers (which would have entailed a tedious and time-consuming chore if the original parts were retained) offer substantial grounds for thinking that the latter is the most likely scenario (both are included in the outline stemma for the work).

The 1893 performance encouraged Mahler to think about further revisions to the score and this was was reinforced by the news, in January 1894, that Strauss had recommended the work for inclusion in the thirtieth festival of the  Allgemeiner Deutscher Musikverein in June of that year (GMRSB,  23–4; GMRSBE, 27; see the notes to ACF2 for a full account of the work's evaluation and acceptance). By 22 April Mahler had received notification of the favourable reports on the Symphony and the possibility of a performance from von Bronsart (the President of the ADM), and replied to indicate that the parts were ready - reflecting the fact during the early months of the year Mahler had further refined the orchestration, and expanded the number of wind instruments required (clearly reflected the late revisions to ACF2), thus entailing a substantial overhaul of the orchestral material. He eventually sent the parts to Strauss (who was to undertake the preparatory rehearsals) on 16 May (see the notes to AFC2 for a detailed narrative of this period in the work's evolution).

The Weimar performance, on 3 June 1894, had little critical success and it was not until 1896, when Mahler arranged and paid for a concert in Berlin devoted solely to his own music, that the work was heard again. Although it cannot be dated with any certainty, it seems very likely that the currently unavailable manuscript score (ACF3) was prepared in connection with this concert; whether the parts used at Weimar were simply revised again, or a new set produced, is unknown. Similarly the final manuscript score (ACF4) may have been produced for the Prague performance on 3 March 1898 and again we do not know what orchestral material was used. However this last score was subsequently used as the copy text for the first edition of the score (PF1), and the usual practice was for the current manuscript parts (in the case of the strings parts, just the first desk of each section) to be used in preparing the printed orchestral material (PO1).

 
Level A conformance icon, Creative Commons Licence

© 2007 Paul Banks | This page was lasted edited on 01 June 2017